Abraham pitched his tents at the Great Trees of Mamre. He made it his place in the world for taking stock before venturing out again.

Commentary on politics, religion, society and ethics.

Saturday 7 March 2015

Coalition


Given the situation that faced the Country in 2010, with no overall majority following the General Election, the Coalition has been a good thing.  Whether you are a Conservative or Liberal Democrat or neither, a Government formed by the Conservatives tempered by the Liberal Democrats has done well, with the economy nurtured back from the brink and, what would be viewed by many voters as, the excesses of a ‘Conservative only’ government have been avoided.

To achieve this Nick Clegg had to take a Statesman-like decision in the Country’s interest and risk the significant criticism and slump in popularity that he and his party have since experienced.

Public sector cuts were required to restore the economy.  The public sector had grown to an unsustainable size in any case.  Large numbers of senior and middle manager posts (highly paid posts contributing very little to the performance of their particular service) needed to go.  And this readjustment should be welcomed.

It now looks likely that there will be no party with an overall majority following the next election.  Alarm has been expressed that significant influence will be held by a minority party (the SNP or possibly UKIP, for example) able to influence policy because its votes are needed in parliament by whichever party is in Government.  

Well to an extent this will be the will of the voters in the UK, and parliamentarians should be expected to work out a way of working with the situation following the election.  Many countries in Europe have already had to do this for many years and have been successful, not least Germany.  Proportional Representation, which would require coalitions to be formed after every election, must be the future for this country.  The feeling that one’s vote has no influence is probably behind the voter apathy that concerns many, and true proportional representation would immediately address this.

However, the big parties are even now considering a ‘grand coalition’ following the election, simply to remove the need to grant smaller parties any influence.  (It should be borne in mind that the number of votes cast for minor parties is far larger in proportion to the number of seats that they win).   

A grand coalition where the two major parties, with largely opposing policies, are willing to get together solely because they cannot bear the thought of relinquishing any power to the influence of others, would be utterly anti-democratic.

No comments:

Post a Comment